Export Modal — Propositions

Six layout options for the redesigned export modal. Switch between them using the bottom bar to compare approaches.

A Flat Checklist
✦ Pros
Familiar pattern, scannable at a glance, inline params appear naturally below their parent row. Minimal clicks.
✦ Cons
Long vertical list — 9 items can feel overwhelming. No visual grouping means France-only items are scattered.

Exporter l'étude

B Grouped Cards
✦ Pros
Visual grouping by category clarifies purpose. Card layout feels modern, gives each option breathing room.
✦ Cons
Taller modal — requires scrolling on smaller screens. Two-column grid can be tricky on narrow viewports.

Exporter l'étude

C Accordion Sections
✦ Pros
Compact by default — users only expand what they need. Great for hiding FR-only sections for non-FR users.
✦ Cons
More clicks to discover all options. Users might miss exports hidden in collapsed sections.

Exporter l'étude

D Card Grid
✦ Pros
All options visible simultaneously as tiles — great overview. Inline parameter cards expand below the row when selected, keeping full context.
✦ Cons
Can feel crowded with 9 tiles. Less room for descriptions. Parameter panels shift layout when they appear.

Exporter l'étude

E Sidebar + Detail
✦ Pros
Dedicated space for descriptions, warnings, and parameter controls. Category nav keeps things organized. Very scalable.
✦ Cons
Wider modal needed. Requires clicking each option to see details — slower for power users who know what they want.

Exporter l'étude

Sélectionnez un format pour voir les détails
F Step Wizard
✦ Pros
Guided flow reduces cognitive load. Users see only relevant info at each step. Confirmation step prevents mistakes on slow exports.
✦ Cons
More steps = more clicks. Power users may find it slow. Single-format selection per pass (no multi-export).
1 Format
2 Options
3 Confirmer